Login lub e-mail Hasło   

Język angielski - Infinitive czy Gerund

Odnośnik do oryginalnej publikacji: http://www.tlumaczenia-angielski.info/an(...)ive.htm
Infinitive Gerund W angielskim występują trzy formy bezokolicznika: To-Infinitive Bare Infinitive Perfect Infinitive to be be to have been Użycie To-Infinitive po przy...
Wyświetlenia: 116.028 Zamieszczono 26/10/2008

Infinitive Gerund

W angielskim występują trzy formy bezokolicznika:

To-Infinitive Bare Infinitive Perfect Infinitive
to be be to have been

Użycie To-Infinitive

  • po przymiotnikach np:
    - It's easy to do it. (Łatwo to zrobić).
    - She is nice to be with. (Miło z nią być).
    - The task seemed to be too difficult to handle. (Zadanie wydawało się zbyt trudne do załatwienia).
  • po czasownikach takich jak:

afford, agree,

appear, arrange,

ask, attempt,

beg, care, cease,

claim, consent,

decide, demand,

deserve, determine,

endeavor, expect,

fail, forget,

hesitate, help,

hope, intend, learn,

manage, mean,

need, neglect,

offer; plan,

prefer, prepare,

pretend, propose,

promise, refuse,

regret, remember,

seem, struggle,

swear, threaten,

try; volunteer,

undertake, wait,

want, wish

  • do wyrażenia celu np:
    - I got up to start a new day. (Wstałem aby zacząć nowy dzień).
    - She went to the kitchen to make breakfast. (Poszła do kuchni zrobić śniadanie).
    - They go to English classes to learn English. (Chodzą na lekcje angielskiego aby nauczyć się angielskiego).

Użycie Bare Infinitive

  • po "would rather" i "had better" np:
    - I would rather stay than go. (Wolę zostać niż iść)
    - You had better study harder. (Lepiej ucz się więcej).
    - I'd rather walk than run. (Wolę chodzić niż biegać).
    - She'd better watch out. (Lepiej niech uważa)
  • po czasownikach modalnych np:
    - I can swim. (Umię pływać).
    - You must stay here and watch him. (Musisz to zostać i go obserwować).
    - They should be here soon. (Powinni tu zaraz być).
    - He may be at home. (On może być w domu).
  • po czasownikach takich jak: "let", "make", "hear", "feel", "help", np:
    - She lets me play with her. (Pozwala mi się ze sobą bawić)
    - He made me make dinner. (Zmusił mnie do zrobienia obiadu).
    - I saw her come back home. (Widziałem jak wróciła do domu).
    - They heard us play. (Słyszeli jak graliśmyy).

Perfect Infinitive

  • do wyrażenia przeszłości (zobacz Perfect infinitive) np.:
    - I'm glad I have bought it. (Cieszę się, że to kupiłem)
    - She must have been here. (Jestem pewny, że tu była [musiała tu być])
    - You are said to have been married. (Mówi się, że byłeś żonaty).

Forma -ing (Gerund)

  • po przyimkach (prepositions) np:
    - He is thinking of going back to school. (Myśli o powrocie do szkoły)
    - I'm interested in writing books. (Interesuje się pisaniem książek)
    - They are good at driving cars and trucks. (Są dobrzy w prowadzeniu samochodów i ciężarówek)
    - Thank you for comming. (Dzięki za przybycie)
  • jako podmiot zdania np:
    - Swimming is good for you. (Pływanie dobrze ci zrobi).
    - Dancing can be tiring. (Taniec maże być męczący).
    - Skiing is a winter sport. (Jazda na nartach jest sportem zimowym).
  • po czasowniku "go" z niektórymi czynnościami np:
    - We can go shopping. (Możemy iść na zakupy)).
    - I'm going skiing. (Idę na narty).
    - She wants to go camping. (Ona chce pojechaać na obóz)
  • po czasownikach takich jak:

admit, advise,

anticipate, appreciate,

avoid, complete,

consider, defer,

delay, deny,

dread, detest,

discuss, dislike,

enjoy, excuse,

fancy, finish,

forgive, Imagine,

involve, keep,

mention, mind,

miss,

pardon, postpone,

practice, prevent,

quit, recall,

recollect, recommend,

regret, remember,

resent, resist,

risk, save,

stop, suggest,

tolerate, understand

Różnica Gerund-Infinitive

Różnice w znaczeniu pomiędzy Infinitive i Gerund

Po niektórych czasownikach może wystąpić zarówno Infinitive jak i Gerund. Mają one inne znaczenie np:

STOP

1) We stopped smoking. Przestaliśmy palić [Rzuciliśmy palenie]. (Nie palimy).

2) We stopped to smoke. Zatrzymaliśmy się aby zapalić (Palimy).

REMEMBER

1) I can't remember locking the door. Nie pamiętam, że zamykałem drzwi. (Być może zamknąłem)

2) I didn't remember to lock the door. Nie pamiętałem aby zamknąć drzwi. (Są otwarte).

FORGET

1) I forgot watching that movie. Zapomniałem, że oglądałem ten film. (Ogłądałem go tylko nie pamiętam)

2) I forgot to watch that movie. Zapomniałem oglądnąć ten film. (Nie widziałem go).

REGRET

1) I regret saying that. Żałuję, że to powiedziałem.

2) I regret to say that. Żałuję, że to powiem (lub mówię)

GO ON

1) He went on introducing people. Kontynuował przedstawianie ludzi.

2) He went on to introduce people. Przeszedł do przedstawiania ludzi.

TRY

1) He tries to study harder. Stara się uczyć więcej (wysiłek)

2) He tries studying. Próbuje sie pouczyć. (i zobaczyć co się stanie).

Przykład:

Try (make an effort) to open this tin.

Try (as an experiment) putting the tin in hot water if it's difficult to open.

I tried to read (starałem się czytać ale z jakiegoś powodu nie mogłem)

I tried reading (Spróbowałem czytania, ale to nie to co chciałem robić :)

LIKE

1) I like dancing. Lubie tańczyć.

2) I like to dance. Lubię tańczyć.

Infinitive

The difference between gerund and infinitive is an interesting problem. (Or possibly not an interesting one, but rather just an area of vagueness, where different people understand English in slightly different ways). The question what the difference bewteen using gerund and infinitive after certain verbs is arises with a large number of English verbs, e.g. is there a difference in meaning between the first and the second sentence? And if so, is it the same difference for each verb?

  1. I like to read books. I like reading books
  2. I prefer to sleep late. I prefer sleeping late
  3. I hate to get up early. I hate getting up early
  4. She deserved to get a raise. She deserved getting a raise.

There was a lot of interest in this question around 1971, when an article called "Fact" was published by Kiparsky and Kiparsky. Not all verbs allow both infinitive and gerund. They noticed that with some verbs, the whole sentence entails that the complement (infinitive or gerund) is undefined, that is, if it is undefined that:

I regret arriving late it must be undefined that I arrived late, but if it's undefined that I hoped to arrive on time then possibly I did arrive on time, possibly I didn't. Then what the Kiparsky noticed was that verbs that entail that there complement is undefined (like regret), often can occur with the gerund but not the infinitive, i.e. in English you can't say: I regret to have arrived late whereas verbs that don't entail the complement (like "hope") often can occur with the infinitive but not the gerund: you don't say in English: I hoped arriving late. They even claimed that some verbs had a difference in meaning depending on which of the two types of complements are used; their example was the verb "report", but I think earier example 4 is a clearer one: 4. She deserved to get a raise. She deserved getting a raise. That is, if the first is undefined, she may or may not have gotten the raise, but if the second is undefined, then she actually did get it. Or so they claimed. Not all English speakers find that the difference is as absolute as that, but most everybody takes (4b) as much more likely to be about an event that definitely did happen. Kiparsky claimed that this principle was pretty generally undefined of verbs in English that take infinitive or gerund complements, or both. But after linguists had checked a very large number of verbs, with a lot of different people, they found (a) lots of exceptions, (b) lots of verbs for which speakers of English disagree about whether there is an entailment of the complement or not. It's undefined that there is a general *tendency* for gerund complements to refer to events that actually did happen (and even more so with derived noun complements, like "the detonation of a bomb near the airport by a terrorist"), and for infinitives to refer to events that may or may not happen (in the future, or may not have happened at the expected time in the past); finite clauses with _that_ ("The newspapers reported that a terrorist detonated a bomb") are somewhere in between on the whole, but are usually dependent on the particular verbs (compare previous sentence with "I regret that a terrorist detonated a bomb") But that is definitely not undefined for ALL verbs. The example of _like_ is more complicated because with this verb both kinds of sentences are about "generic events", or habits, not about a single event. It is (actually) undefined that I like reading books in German, even though I very rarely do read books in German; one linguist suggested that "I like my steaks rare" can be undefined even though I never get a rare steak when I order one, ever. So the question is not exactly whether a certain event did occur or may not have occurred (as with 'report', 'regret' examples above), since these sentences are not really about particular events so much as about your disposition toward certain kinds of events. Given this tendency it would not be suprising to discover that with _like_, there is some semantic distinction or other related to that difference, maybe only distantly. But also not surprising to discover there is no difference. There is one important difference, if you use the form "would like", then the sentence makes a statement about one and only one future event---that it will please me if it happens: "Someday I would like to see the site where the World Trade Center buildings stood." can be undefined if I definitely don't want to see the site more than once. (It doesn't rule out that I might like to do it more than one, but the sentence itself doesn't say anything about that.) This is not something that always happens systematically when you introduce "would", so (as I think you suspect) "would like to <verb>" is what's called in linguistics an "idiom" (or "collocation"), by which is meant simply any phrase that has some meaning as a whole that goes beyond the literal meanings of the words in it. For example, "I would be happy to help you, if you need it" and "I am happy to help you, if you need it", the only clear difference is that the first is more indirect, hence (usually) more polite, or formal, but also maybe less of a commitment (as you also observed with _would_like_). As for myself, I can't find any difference at all in meaning between "I like to read books" and "I like reading books" (when there is no "would" that is) ---although I had to stop and think about this for a few moments to be sure. (Maybe I am a bit more likely to SAY the second if I do read books regularly, or if I'm commenting on an activity I'm engaged in at this moment, but that isn't the same thing as a difference in what they MEAN.) But it would not surprise me at all if you take a survey and find that a significant number of people do find that there is a difference. But in that event, I would expect that many of them could not put their finger on just what the difference is, if you asked them to, and that of those who could explain a difference, it would not be the same difference for all of them. This could well be one of those cases (of which there are many, although they are rare in comparison to our vocabulary as a whole) where all the sentences using that word which we hear or read while growing up underdetermine the meaning of the word (or in this case, whether there is any difference between the two forms), so different people will make slightly different assumptions about the meaning, and in most cases never become aware that not everybody else shares their assumptions. ("I like to read a good book" is not a sentence I find completely well-formed semantically, so I would probably not say it, though I would not flinch if I heard someone else say it, and it should mean the same as "I like reading a good book", which is the same as "I like to read good books".)

Podobne artykuły


54
komentarze: 84 | wyświetlenia: 10676
43
komentarze: 41 | wyświetlenia: 6024
118
komentarze: 23 | wyświetlenia: 237825
31
komentarze: 7 | wyświetlenia: 86393
50
komentarze: 14 | wyświetlenia: 67126
15
komentarze: 4 | wyświetlenia: 22047
158
komentarze: 114 | wyświetlenia: 70927
13
komentarze: 14 | wyświetlenia: 7602
11
komentarze: 8 | wyświetlenia: 16187
10
komentarze: 15 | wyświetlenia: 5046
8
komentarze: 7 | wyświetlenia: 39657
8
komentarze: 1 | wyświetlenia: 7484
7
komentarze: 4 | wyświetlenia: 3483
 
Autor
Artykuł




Brak wiadomości


Dodaj swoją opinię
W trosce o jakość komentarzy wymagamy od użytkowników, aby zalogowali się przed dodaniem komentarza. Jeżeli nie posiadasz jeszcze swojego konta, zarejestruj się. To tylko chwila, a uzyskasz dostęp do dodatkowych możliwości!
 

© 2005-2018 grupa EIOBA. Wrocław, Polska